National Seminars

National Seminar

Linking Cost Containment and Continuous Quality Improvement in Higher Education
April 15 & 16, 2004
Chicago, Illinois
Hilton Chicago
8:00 a.m. – 4:0
0 p.m. Daily
 

 Webinars

What’s In It For Me?

Introduction to Institutional Effectiveness
 

North Central Region: Accreditation and Continuous Quality Improvement – A Partnership Worth Pursuing?

The Essential Ingredients of Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
 

Measuring Success:

The Balanced Scorecard for Higher Education
 

Effective Student Assessment:

The Continuous Quality Improvement Approach
 

Efficiency and Effectiveness:

Activity-Based Costing in Higher Education
 

 Resources

Association for the Study of Higher Education

NSF Academic Institutional Profiles

National Center for Postsecondary Improvement


[ More ... ]
 

 Events

2004 American Council on Education (ACE) Conference
Feb 28 - Mar 2, 2004
Miami, FL

2004 Datatel Users' Group Conference & Expo
Mar 12 - 16, 2004
Marriott Wardman
Park Hotel, Washington, D.C.

2004 NERCOMP Conference
Mar 21 - 23, 2004
Worcester, MA


[ More Events ... ]
 

 Publications

Center for International Higher Education

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Enrollment Management Review

Higher Education and National Affairs

Marketing Higher Education
 

 Associations

American College Personnel Association (ACPA)

Association of American Colleges and Universities (AACU)

Association of College and University Housing Officers- International (ACUHO-I)

Association of Governing Boards (AGB)


[ More ... ]
 

 Subscribe

Enter your email address.


Add Remove
Send as HTML
Uncheck for Lotus Notes Users

 

 Archive

Issue 5
January 13, 2004
Vol. 1 Issue 5
Issue 4
December 8, 2003
Vol. 1 Issue 4
Issue 3
November 11, 2003
Vol. 1 Issue 3
Issue 2
September 9, 2003
Vol. 1 Issue 2
Premier Issue
June 27, 2003
Vol. 1 Issue 1
Back to Newsletter

 Featured Story

From Crisis to Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Winner

Transforming the University of Wisconsin-Stout with a grassroots strategic planning process

Charles W. Sorensen speaks with Higher Education Digest

Grassroots, giving power to the masses, is a bold, democratic concept; one in which the University of Wisconsin-Stout recently embraced with strategic planning. A severe shortfall in state funding contributed to a political crisis at UW-Stout necessitating this new system, one that emphasized short-term responses, long-term structural changes, and adoption of the Baldrige criteria.

Webinar

Strategic Planning

Dates:

  • March 11, 2004 2:30-3:30pm EST
  • March 23, 2004 10-11:00am EST

Register for this FREE Webinar!

In an article in the New York Times, titled Presidential Perspectives, From Crisis to Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, Chancellor Sorensen candidly describes what happened at the university — how its campus-wide planning process led the university to become the first ever higher education winner of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award in 2001.

Financial crisis instigates major change

Back in the 1990s, the University of Wisconsin System’s budget was cut five percent. The Board of Regents looked at innovative strategies for managing the financial crisis, and discussed the concept of a university withdrawing from the system and becoming a "charter school." With its market-driven career-oriented programs and relationships with employers, Chancellor Sorensen volunteered UW-Stout.

In 1995, Chancellor Sorensen, along with the interim Vice Chancellor for Administration and a small group of staff, drafted the charter proposal. Looking back on it, Chancellor Sorensen says, "I made key mistakes: the Provost was not pulled into the planning process; I was away from campus often lobbying for our budget; and finally, I did not communicate that the proposal was merely a request to study the issue in greater detail."

Turmoil erupted at UW-Stout leading to a no confidence vote. Chancellor Sorensen met with departments, held open forums, and conducted face-to-face meetings, establishing short and long-term strategies. As Chancellor Sorensen says, "I was accessible to everyone and listened carefully to what they said. Involving the Faculty Senate became my second short-term tactic, and I asked to meet with their Executive Committee. One thing stands out about that meeting; the faculty truly wanted to discuss how to open up the lines of communication."

Four issues emerged from these early grassroots meetings, which called for organizational change; open communication, an inclusive decision-making process, a participative budget process, and effective technology management. Within months, UW-Stout made significant advances in all four areas, positioning the university to receive the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. In summarizing these changes, Chancellor Sorensen states that, "I relinquished power to gain authority, respect, and influence."

Higher Education Digest recently interviewed Charles Sorensen, Chancellor of University of Wisconsin-Stout, winner of the 2001 Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, to get his perspective on UW-Stout’s successful strategic planning process.

HED: How did the university implement the strategic planning process?

Sorensen: University staff met with key members of the university community to identify common themes and concerns so that the strategic planning process would fit the culture and needs of the campus. The strategic planning process was developed and deployed over a sixyear period with the university implementing improvements that allowed for early and dramatic change. One of the early changes in 1996 was the establishment of a new leadership structure, the Chancellor's Advisory Council (CAC). This 21-member council includes representatives from: the Senate, the classified staff, the students, and the administration, and meets bi-weekly to review planning and discuss budget issues. CAC distributes the leadership among all campus groups.

Formal team building is a key component of this leadership system. Each stakeholder has the opportunity to influence the direction of the campus.

HED: How does the budget office align priorities?

Sorensen: Following the turmoil on campus in 1996, the Office of Budget, Planning, and Analysis (BPA) was formed. The BPA developed a new open budget process for establishing priorities. In the first year of the budget process, over 250 faculty, staff and students attended ten facilitated group sessions. There was about 20% employee participation.

The Chancellor’s Advisory Council (CAC) reviewed the themes and recommended final campus priorities and funding. Facilitated focus group sessions are held annually and, since 1996, 45 priorities have been identified and funded or are in the process of being funded. A recommendation is not discussed unless there is adequate support. All priorities are aligned with the strategic plan.

HED: How does the University set goals and measure success?

Sorensen: As stated in UW-Stout’s application for the Baldrige award, the Strategic Planning Committee (SPC) performs several critical tasks in the strategy development process including: vision, values, mission review, situation analysis (SWOT), five-year goal setting, action plans review, and performance measurement identification.

By systematically aligning people, process, and technology, the university can see if funding a goal is possible. If there are not enough resources, it does not become a goal. Each year the university establishes four to six priorities for funding. In examining a priority, the university asks the following questions:

  1. What issue is being addressed?

  2. What solution is being proposed?

  3. Can you demonstrate a linkage to the strategic plan, proving it matters?

  4. What has to be done?

  5. Who is going to do it?

  6. What is the timeline?

  7. What is needed to succeed? Are fiscal or other resources needed?

  8. What information will be collected to benchmark / measure the success?

Every six months the SPC reports updates on progress to the Chancellor, CAC, and the university community.

HED: How is SPC a grassroots approach to budgeting?

Sorensen: Our priority setting is a campus-wide function based on everyone’s involvement. It is top down, and bottom up. To make it work, you have to have strong planning support, leadership and an open process. The process involves communication, commitment, leadership, and support.

This systematic approach means that budget choices are determined by the team.

The university’s budget is on the Web. Budget decisions are not hidden. This creates trust in how the university spends its money.

HED: How does the SPC set benchmarks for measuring success?

Sorensen: As cited in UW-Stout’s application for the Baldrige award, the SPC defines and develops institutional performance measures, called ‘Strategic Indicators.’ These performance targets are based upon strategic goals, and are derived from projecting past performance into the future.

The University examines its strategic indicators against 25 peer schools nationwide. For example, UW-Stout is a technology campus and regularly tracks the use of computers in the classroom compared to its peers.

HED: How do constituents contribute to the planning process?

Sorensen: The CAC is democratic and holds nine facilitated sessions on campus annually. CAC meets regularly to communicate or make decisions. Constituents, both external and internal, have several opportunities to influence and participate in university planning.

  • Internal stakeholders have the opportunity to participate in focus group sessions each fall: through their governance/organizational structures, as individuals, or by logging on to the university priority message board.

  • External stakeholder participation is also important to the university, and stakeholder visioning is held periodically to identify strengths and opportunities for our institution.

One issue constituents have brought up is the need for supporting technology, specifically laptops. This helped drive the university to become a wireless campus. The same thing happened with the university’s new computer network. Back in 1997, the need for a new network was brought up at a CAC meeting and logged as a budgetary priority.

Now, participation in campus open forums is at 30%, a high rate compared to grassroots politics, which average around 2%.

In giving power to the people, the University of Wisconsin-Stout has proved this way of working together is not just a concept for politics, but a viable approach for university strategic planning.


Dr. Charles W. Sorensen has served as Chancellor of the University of Wisconsin-Stout since 1988. Under his leadership, the university has experienced significant success in program development, distance education efforts, the use of technology in the classroom, private fundraising, and a vibrant technology transfer program. UW-Stout was selected by the U.S. Department of Commerce for the prestigious 2001 Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award in the education category.


 More Webinars

What’s In It For Me?: Introduction to Institutional Effectiveness

Measuring Success: The Balanced Scorecard for Higher Education

Effective Student Assessment: The Continuous Quality Improvement Approach

Efficiency and Effectiveness: Activity-Based Costing in Higher Education

North Central Region: Accreditation and Continuous Quality Improvement – A Partnership Worth Pursuing?

Register and you could win a $100 Amazon.com gift certificate.

Sponsors

"Not just the usual cheerleading. I appreciated the in depth analysis of 'why' Continuous Improvement benefits us and how I can make it work on my campus."

Executive Participant, Continuous Improvement Workshop

The Center  can accelerate a quality initiative on your campus.  Click here for more information


"InternetVIZ helps us focus on what is important to your business.
This dedication ensures The Higher Education Digest meets your goals."

Donna Taylor, Dean of the Center for Institutional Effectiveness

InternetVIZ can make enewsletters work for you.  Click here for more information


Published by Datatel
Copyright © 2004 InternetVIZ. All rights reserved.

Powered by IMN