Deliver business-critical information to anyone, anytime, anywhere.
Rocky
and Bullwinkle on the Information Life Span
Hokey
Smoke! How Long Should We Keep This Stuff?
by Lou Washington - Cincom Systems
Rocky & Bullwinkle Hokey Smoke!
A few
weeks back I wandered onto a ComputerWorld Blog that was asking if we should
try to permanently keep certain kinds of information. I felt compelled at the time to throw in my humble opinion on
that subject so I posted a reply.
My
feeling was that most information was useless after a short period of
time. That permanent retention of information
should be limited to researchable scientific data and valuable cultural items
such as Rocky & Bullwinkle cartoons.
After
reading some of the reactions to this question and also to my own particular
take on the subject, I thought perhaps a more detailed discussion was
warranted.
My first
career in the information management world was within a Records Management
context. Records
Management is a field that really solidified in the years following World
War II. At that time, the U.S. federal
government had been packing away information, mostly paper documents, for
nearly 175 years. Most of this
information was stuffed into any space not used for something else.
No one. Not one. No one!
No one
ever threw anything away because no one was authorized to throw anything
away. File cabinets were purchased by
the train carload. When these were
filled, department bosses would scratch their heads and look around for empty
space. Files were pulled out of office
environments, stuck in any old container that was handy and wheeled away to the
nearest attic, basement, garage or stairwell where they would remain for
eternity.
Most
people don’t realize it, but the original design of the Washington Monument
included file drawers from the sidewalk level all the way up to the viewing
windows at the top. Another obscure
fact is that NASA’s original mission to the Moon was to evaluate it as a
potential records storage site. They
figured, plenty of space and not a lot of moisture ... it was ideal! You won’t hear much about these ideas
because the people responsible for them now work in Area 51 with aliens on
their storage issues.
Finally
someone had the presence of mind to ask the question, “ ... how long should we keep this junk?” Thus, the field of Records Management was
born.
Initially
the practitioners of this art were concerned primarily with paper files. This did change to some degree as other
technologies were developed, such as the use of microfilm and the digitization
of data. Unfortunately, many Records
Managers did not actively involve themselves with their organization’s IT
operations and hence they suffered from the perception that their only value
was related to the maintenance of paper based data. Sort of a souped-up file room supervisor for the entire
enterprise.
The
Records Manager and the DP/MIS Director were frequently political enemies in
competition for the same funds. Let’s
face it folks, machines with blinking lights and spinning tape reels will beat
out file cabinets every time. The
glamour factor is powerful.
Sure,
Records Managers brought us Microfilm.
It had and still has some application today, but by in large it is
extremely expensive and really doesn’t get the job done for many active
information based processes.
So, our
friend, Mr. Computer won the battle if there ever was a battle to win. Storage media quickly evolved with
capacities that were and still are almost mind-boggling. This evolution continues and will continue
for longer than I would care to predict.
Unfortunately,
those Records Managers that were reluctant to become involved in this now
essential aspect of most organizations, have no voice to deliver the answer to
the question that is still being asked, “. . . how long do we have to keep
this junk?” And, that is really a
shame, because they have the answer!
People
have come to not care how long we keep information because the cost to maintain
that information was greatly reduced via high-capacity storage media and
inexpensive storage facilities. But,
as any competent Records Manager will tell you, storage costs are only part of
the equation. Just because you can
keep something around, does not mean you should keep something around.
All
information, regardless of format or media type must be evaluated and
maintained according to a corporate or organization-wide plan. The evaluation process must be a documented
repeatable internal process. You cannot
go out and buy a book that will tell you how long you must keep a particular
type of information.
This is
particularly true in light of the tendency many us of have to keep all of our
“important” papers around forever, preserved for posterity. I know I have tons of stuff laying around
that I just know future generations will want to pore over when visiting the Lou
Washington Library of Stimulating Thoughts. My friends are planning to construct this shortly after I pass on
to the hereafter.
The fact
is that most information has a specific useful lifespan following which it becomes a liability.
The bane
of all Records Management programs is the almost pathological need of some
folks to store things permanently.
This brings us to the original question posted on the blog. How long is permanent? Would, say 5,000 years be long enough? Don’t be ridiculous you say, Okay, how about
1,000 years? Come-on, get real! Can I talk you into 50 years? Can I get a show of hands for 25 years?
All of
those choices are in fact way, way less than permanent. Permanent is forever, permanent is eternity,
the end of time. You know what I mean
here, the lake of fire and the
seven-headed dragon. Permanent
means you want your personal papers kept longer than the earth has been in
business to date. We did have some stuff that was indeed scheduled for 25-year
retention term. But, our permanent
records fit neatly into a single, fairly small box. Most of them probably didn’t belong
there.
Organizations
that have successfully implemented programs to address this use a fairly simple
set of criteria to determine the answer to the how long do we keep this questions. First you have to deal with information as a
whole, not specific data points. You
can’t think in terms of do we save this purchase order for five years
and that one for two years. The
question must be how long do we save purchase orders?
Here’s the ruler you use to make
these decisions.
You need
to establish three and occasionally four separate values for any information
set you are working with.
These are
the administrative value, legal value, vital value and
finally the occasional one, the archival value of the information. Let’s look at each one separately.
Administrative
Value – Simply
put, how long is the information useful to the business or organization? How long must the information be available
in order for the organization to conduct its business? What happens when the information is not
available? We’ll take a look at how this
works a bit later.
Legal Value
– This is always the
one people get worked up about. Yet,
this is usually the one with the most latitude. Various government units such as EPA, IRS, SEC, FTC and the rest
of the TLAs might have very
specific performance criteria for your company or organization. These will relate to the regulations that
they are responsible for. There may be
specific compliance forms you are required to periodically submit to these agencies
that document your performance under the body of law or regulations they maintain. The CFR
or other publications might list specific required retention periods for the
supporting data that backs up these submissions.
Chances
are they won’t. Especially non-federal
governments, but that does not mean the feds are going to tell you exactly how
long to keep something. The IRS was
notorious for skirting this by requiring that information be maintained,
“… until audit requirements are met” or something equally nebulous.
Archival Value – Here we are talking about historically important records. This value is highly subjective in nature
and for many companies; this might not even be an issue. If you are Microsoft and you have a cocktail
napkin with a few lines of handwritten code in Bill Gates’ hand and perhaps a
note to call IBM about DOS ... that
has archival value. The PO authorizing
the purchase of a new chair for Bill Gate’s office would not have any
particular archival value.
Vital
Records – These
are truly rare. This is information
that the organization must have in order to operate. For companies, this would include things like the corporate
charter, certain patents or copyrights and so forth. These are the only records that would be close to being permanent.
Okay, how
does all of this work. We’ll pick
something that is both sensitive, but still fairly universal in nature.
Employee attendance
records. These
records tell you what days your employees worked, took vacation, were out sick
or took personal leave.
How long
is this information useful? Let’s say
you revise vacation day allowances once per year and supervisors refer to these
“records” on the employee anniversary date as part of the review process. So, let’s say from a use standpoint, this
information is useful for a maximum of two years. This would cover the annual vacation carry over calculation plus
the annual review that could occur up to 12 months following the fiscal year
end. So, ADMIN VALUE = 2 years.
What
about legal requirements? Is there anything
that tells you that you must keep attendance records for any specific
time? Probably not. Perhaps your General Counsel is cautious and
decides to look at how long dismissed employees have to file a wrongful
dismissal action against an employer. Let’s
say the law allows a dismissed employee 36 months after dismissal to file a
suit against an employer they believe dismissed them unfairly. So now we have other criteria to consider. Employees fired for poor attendance could
legally dispute the firing for the three years following their termination.
LEGAL
VALUE = 36 months following the fiscal year of the record or the dismissal date
of the employee, which ever comes last.
Is this
an Archival record? No. ARCHIVAL VALUE = 0
Is this a
vital record? No. VITAL = 0
Most of
time you will just look at the four categories, pick the longest time the
information is considered valuable and go with that.
But,
sometimes, it’s just not quite that simple.
Lets say
you have a body of information related to the production of widgets. This information consists of the production
date, the lot and serial number of the widget and the manufacture and
distribution data for the widget all the way from the source of the supplies
and raw material going into the widget to the end-user purchasing the widget.
You make
and sell thousands and thousands of widgets every month. Your quality control
is very good and ultimately only 1 in 5 million widgets fail. Even the most creative misuse of your widget
would not result in any potential injury but under the assorted consumer
protection laws you are responsible for replacing defective widgets for a
period of five years after purchase.
After
careful analysis, you find out that storing all the production data on your
widget product for a period of five years will cost you 3 million dollars. The maximum number of returned widgets over
the five-year period is 100 and each of those has a total replacement cost of
US$10,000.
Are you
going to spend three million dollars protecting yourself from a one million
dollar liability? Of course not. Forget the legal requirement in this case
and trash the production records at the conclusion of their useful life.
Here’s
another thought. What liability do you
create by keeping certain information around beyond its useful life? When something exists, and you know it
exists, and it has some evidentiary value related to some sort of legal
exposure, you can’t just decide to pitch that material and then tell the court
that you can’t find the subject information. That is considered tampering with
evidence.
But, what
if you destroy specific records deliberately, according to a documented
schedule as part of your normal business process? This is not unusual at all.
Companies want to save money.
They don’t want to store reams of paper, racks of tape or boxes of other
media any longer then they have too.
Why? It cost tons of money to
store anything indefinitely.
Here’s another reason why
A recent
President of the United States maintained tapes of conversations that took
place in the Oval Office. Mid-way
through an investigation of his actions as President of the United States, the
existence of these tapes became known to the prosecutors involved in the
investigation. Naturally they subpoenaed
the tapes and the end result was this particular sitting president resigned his
office.
Nowhere
did it say he was required to maintain tapes of his office conversations. Nowhere did the law require him to keep
tapes, once created, for any particular period of time. If he had established a practice of
regularly destroying the Oval Office recordings every thirty days or every year
or every single day, he would not have been in violation of any law regarding
the destruction of evidence.
But, once
the subpoena arrived, he was toast. He
was compelled to produce the tapes. Any attempt to modify, destroy or alter the
tapes would have been considered a criminal act.
This
happens regularly to individuals, corporations and other organizations. It is critical to make sure that materials
scheduled for destruction are indeed destroyed. There are many examples of legal actions being helped along by
some employee who thought they were doing a good thing by taking a certain
record or document home with them for safe keeping. Sometime during the investigation this
employee feels compelled to come forward and produce the damning
information. Thus their employer is
found liable for something that they would otherwise not be proven liable for.
In
closing, we don’t want to keep data permanently unless we want to be held
responsible for every conclusion that data might support.
Would you
want to be held legally liable for the actions of all of your fore
bearers?
Great-great-great
grand-dad the deserter during the Civil War?
Uncle
Charlie the income tax cheat?
Great
Aunt Wanda the carjacker. (yes, they are all related to me.)
Of course
you wouldn’t.
Companies
and organization are no different.
About Lou Washington
Professional Life: Started my
career in Information Management from the somewhat misunderstood field of
Records Management. Following four years of working for the University of
Missouri System's Office of Records Management, I joined Tab Products Co. in
1980. Shortly thereafter, I became interested in the software business, PCs and
how those systems would shape the enterprise of the future. We were transferred
to Tab's then corporate HQ in Palo Alto, CA. I was the first Product Manager
for Tab's Tracker systems software products, which utilized a PC-based
bar-coding system to track the movements of everything from files to capital
assets. I believe it was the earliest example of workflow automation available
on the market. I was also peripherally involved in Tab's Laser Optics division,
which brought to market one of the earliest business systems employing CD-ROM
and WORM technology as an information-storage media.
In
1990, I returned to Cincinnati and joined
Cincom
Systems where I began to learn and work with mainframe-oriented products
and systems. In those days, there was a real "split" between the
mainframe forces and the desktop proponents. I always found this to be amusing
since both had so many positive things to offer an enterprise.
My
present role at Cincom involves a number of things including product security,
pricing, finance packaging and industry research.
My
wife, Barbara, and I reside in Park Hills, KY. I am a member of Blessed
Sacrament Church and I am active in a local car club, Cincinnati Cruisers. We
are a group of PT Cruiser owners who enjoy tricking out our cruisers and
driving around annoying people who have to drive boring cars. I am the
webmaster for the Cruisers, and I invite everyone to visit
www.cincyptcruisers.com
and check out our awesome rides! Barbara and I both enjoy photography, travel
and our two four legged canine children, Chloe and Cookie.
[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]