July 14, 2007      

Issue 5.8

[ TELL A FRIEND ]
  Webinars . . .

Turning Technical Experts into Trusted Advisors



 


  Book Review . . .

Death by PowerPoint

by Michael Flocker

Meryl's Review
 

 


  Reader Survey . . .
What do you think?

Complete our 1-minute reader survey and you could win a PAIR of Garmin Rino 110 MP3 GPS.
 


  Subscribe . . .

Please enter your email address


Add Remove
Send as HTML
 


  Friends of PSJ . . .


 


  Archives . . .
Issue 5.9
August 14, 2007
Issue 5.7
June 20, 2007
Issue 5.6
May 24, 2007
Issue 5.5
April 19, 2007
Issue 5.4
March 26, 2007
Issue 5.3
February 20, 2007
Issue 5.2
January 23, 2007
Issue 5.1
January 8, 2007
Issue 4.45
December 19, 2006
Issue 4.44
December 8, 2006
Issue 4.43
November 21, 2006

[MORE]
Feature Story ...

What Trusted Advisors Do that Others Don’t

Discovering what makes the difference

by James A. Alexander, Ed.D.

What are the benefits of trusted advisors? In the professional services industry, a lot of people are talking about the need for turning technical experts into trusted advisors. There is a very good reason for this, as no other role in the organization has more potential impact. My experience is that those who achieve trusted advisor status do the following:

Landmark study from Alexander Consulting

“This is one great piece of groundbreaking research!”

Use the untapped power of your technical experts.

Transitioning Technical Experts into Trusted Advisors shows you the way!

  • Build deeper customer relationships.

  • Provide more complete solutions.

  • Accelerate business development.

  • Are more satisfied in their jobs.

  • Help their organizations create competitive advantage.

Naturally, practiced leaders are keen to leverage these talented individuals (and find/develop more) in order to achieve those results.

What does a trusted advisor look like?

The term “trusted advisor” is a catchy phrase, but how do you know one when you see one? You can recognize trusted advisors by these characteristics:

  • Clients ask for them by name.

  • They are sought out for advice that goes beyond their described expertise.

  • They maintain relationships that aren’t just technical.

  • They have such strong personal brands that outsiders seek them out for speaking engagements, writing articles or special projects.

  • They can have ponytails, wear Hawaiian shirts, make (occasional) smart comments, and executives still love them!

How many of your consultants fit that description? Although organizations vary, on average about 5 percent fall into the trusted advisor category. Naturally, it makes sense to expand the cadre of these folks!

What separates trusted advisors from everybody else?

Before trying to hire outside personnel to act as trusted advisors or prior to trying to transition your existing consultants into this role, it is vital to know the unique behaviors required. My latest research (see sidebar: About the Trusted Advisor Research) provides some direction in learning how trusted advisors act differently from others holding the same job description. Figure 1 shows the seven most important categories of responses from 80 executives regarding the key behavioral differences between these two groups.

Of the research participants, 48 percent said that “great communication skills” are trusted-advisor behaviors that their top consultants possess and their average performers don’t. Here are a few of the responses in this category in the exact words of participants:

  • “They communicate the invisible well.”

  • “Superior creativity in listening to client issues and creating a solution strategy that clearly shows how it solves the problem quickly and thoroughly (the differentiator is the level of creativity, understanding of the issue and speed with which they react).”

  • “Superb communicators with clients, team members and management within our company.”

  • “They find a way to outline options and the pros and cons to the client in such a way that this becomes the client’s direction.”

Responses about “seizing the initiative” were given by 30 percent of the participants. Phrases that capture the essence of what respondents meant include:

  • “Offering advice other than just doing what they are told to do! The trusted advisor may alter the agreement because he or she does the right thing at the expense of the short-term business, but with longer service payoffs!”

  • “Looking beyond their role with regard to ‘what would the CEO want to know?’”

  • “Taking ownership of the customer more, whereas average performers take ownership of the problem.”

“Putting the client first” was brought up as a differentiator by 24 percent of participants. Phrases that represent this category include:

  • “Doing the right thing even if it means the organization does not get the work.”

  • “Always seeking ways to provide greater value to the customer.”

  • “They never jeopardize their client relationship in order to close a deal. If they believe the deal is in the customer’s best interest, they will make every attempt to convince the customer to purchase it. Over time, clients recognize this and value the advisor’s input.”

About the Trusted Advisor Research

During the summer and fall of 2006, 80 service executives (40 primarily responsible for professional services and 40 primarily responsible for traditional service and support) in technology companies shared their thoughts on five questions:

  1. When it comes to leading and managing your technical experts, what are your top two or three issues?

  2. What (if anything) has changed your expectations of your technical experts in the last two years?

  3. What metrics are you using now to measure the performance of your technical experts?

  4. Which of the following best describes your expectations of your technical experts regarding business development? (Participants received six choices.)

  5. What “trusted advisor” behaviors do your top performers exhibit?

Researchers sorted the data into overall findings, and then compared the responses of professional services managers against those whose main responsibilities were traditional product support services. From this data, services leaders received recommendations to help them address these important issues. Here is more information on this study.

Comments related to “exhibiting extreme confidence and courage” were mentioned by 16 percent of respondents. Representative comments are as follows:

  • “Courage to deliver competent, clear council to Fortune 500 CXOs.”

  • “They are fearless in their approach to problem solving.”

  • “Extremely high levels of confidence.”

“Business acumen” was brought up by 15 percent of all participants:

  • “Knowledge both of the client’s environment and our business … they take the trouble to understand more, and it pays off.”

  • “Have a better grasp of overall business needs.”

  • “Bring a rich portfolio of practical experiences, relationships with others and an understanding of business dynamics and market trends.”

“Big-picture thinking” responses were made by 11 percent of the respondents. Comments include:

  • “Understand the big picture.”

  • “Our top performers have a holistic viewpoint. They clearly see the importance and fit of professional services as part of the overall solution when combined with hardware, software and consumables. Our average performers fail to leverage the strength and diversity of our entire organization.”

  • “Have a program-level horizon instead of a project-level horizon.”

Finally, being “very technically strong” was brought up by 10 percent of this group. This was expressed as:

  • “They all display tremendous technical knowledge and skills.”

  • “Very deep technical knowledge.”

  • “Broad understanding of products and services.”

There you have the insights of your peers regarding how they distinguish between their star performers and everyone else. This can serve as a good starting point if you assume the goal of trying to get more trusted advisors working for you.

The good news is that from a hiring standpoint, all the behaviors mentioned can be identified, profiled and interviewed/verified against. Build these into your recruiting profiles. The excellent news is that from a developmental standpoint, much of the above is learnable by your personnel. Solid training (especially in communication/persuasion skills) coupled with clear communication from leadership as to business goals, organization priorities and expectations can lead to impressive changes. Add to that recognition and rewards, and you will quickly see more trusted advisor behaviors that will make your clients, your organization, your consultants and you more successful.


Jim Alexander is the founder of Alexander Consulting, LLP, a management consultancy that creates and implements professional services strategies for product companies. He researches, writes, consults and trains on the critical issues of the services industry. Dr. Alexander is also the U.S. Department of Commerce e-business subject-matter expert for the Inter-American E-Business Fellowship Program and was named the services pundit for the IBM Global Services 2003 Headlights Program. A services industry thought leader, he has published scores of articles, white papers, research studies and books, his most recent being S-Business: Reinventing the Services Organization.

Contact Alexander at 239-283-7400, alex@alexanderstrategists.com, or visit http://www.alexanderstrategists.com.

© Alexander Consulting


[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]
 

eNewsletters, eSurveys, eSeminars and eBooks developed specifically for your organization

 

 

Copyright © 2006 InternetVIZ, LLC

Spam Policy | Privacy Promise    

Powered by IMN